以文本方式查看主题 - W3CHINA.ORG讨论区 - 语义网·描述逻辑·本体·RDF·OWL (http://bbs.xml.org.cn/index.asp) -- 『 Web Services & Semantic Web Services 』 (http://bbs.xml.org.cn/list.asp?boardid=10) ---- 一份关于Java开发者对SOA的采纳程度的调查结果 (http://bbs.xml.org.cn/dispbbs.asp?boardid=10&rootid=&id=29647) |
-- 作者:admin -- 发布时间:3/31/2006 11:33:00 AM -- 一份关于Java开发者对SOA的采纳程度的调查结果 Java Developer Survey Results A few months ago, CodeFutures sent out a survey in its monthly newsletter on SOA usage and performance problems. There were some surprising results. The survey results can be summarized as: -Three quarters of enterprises using Java are using or planning to use Service Oriented Archiectures -Over 30% have scalability problems and 56% have performance problems due to bottlenecks -The vast majority of Java developers surveyed believe they have high performance requirements -About one third of the Java developers surveyed had groups using C++ as well and Web Services technology is still relevant for C++ development
Survey Data Quality Yes – 76.5% Analysis: The results confirm that Web Services/SOA technology is now fully mainstream and has widespread acceptance, even if it is not yet in widespread use. Using standards-based specifications for SOA provides huge cost savings in the long run compared with proprietary middleware like MOM. Yes – 31% Analysis: Technically not a surprise. But its interesting that almost 1 in 3 Java developers are willing to ADMIT scalability problems. Yes – 56.7% Analysis: This is perhaps the most solid result in the survey because the question is very specific. The result seems very high, so this is perhaps the item that should be followed up in another survey. Yes – 84.5% Analysis: What “very high performance” means is subjective, but what is important for architectural decisions is that Java developers BELIEVE the have high performance requirements. Note that the profile of the developers in this survey probably taints this result. One thing is sure, the traditional J2EE server farms approach to scalability is just not working (whereas the POJO movement is gaining traction). Yes- 33.5% Analysis: This seems very high, but that's probably because CodeFutures has very little exposure to the C++ market. The result may be higher than normal due to the profile of the CodeFutures newsletter subscription list, which favors the top end of the Java market – large enterprises – that were probably developing in C++ before Java was introduced. Yes: 30.1% Analysis: This is an extraordinary percentage, but the question is “may wish” rather than a more definitive ‘plan to use’. Interestingly, there were many that responded No to having development groups using C++ but yes to being interested in C++ Web Services. That seems to imply that legacy applications written in C++ are going to be maintained and used through Web Services. Good news for vendors of C++ Web Services technology. CodeFutures was interested in this question because the SDO API is available in both C++ and Java. As it happens, the Service Component Architecture specification was announced around the time of the survey, which of course, puts SDO in a completely different perspective and makes it a much more strategic decision. http://www.codefutures.com/weblog/corporate/ |
W 3 C h i n a ( since 2003 ) 旗 下 站 点 苏ICP备05006046号《全国人大常委会关于维护互联网安全的决定》《计算机信息网络国际联网安全保护管理办法》 |
382.813ms |