其实，Schema Matching/Ontology Mapping的研究目前为止有最好的3篇综述论文(如果要强加IJCAI Workshop的那篇我也没有办法)，对于做这个方向的每个人来说，没有详细看过这三篇论文简直是不可思议。

最新的也是最好的这个方向的综述的bibtex如下：
article{
   author = {Pavel Shvaiko and J. Euzenat},
   title = {A Survey of Schema-Based Matching Approaches},
   journal = {Journal on Data Semantics},
   volume = {LNCS 3730},
   number = {IV},
   year = {2005},
   abstract = {...Many different matching solutions have been proposed
so far. In this paper we present a new classification of schema-based matching
techniques that builds on the top of state of the art in both schema and ontology
matching. Some innovations are in introducing new criteria which are based on
(i) general properties of matching techniques, (ii) interpretation of input information,
and (iii) the kind of input information. In particular, we distinguish between
approximate and exact techniques at schema-level; and syntactic, semantic, and
external techniques at element- and structure-level. Based on the classification
proposed we overview some of the recent schema/ontology matching systems
pointing which part of the solution space they cover. The proposed classification
provides a common conceptual basis, and, hence, can be used for comparing different
existing schema/ontology matching techniques and systems as well as for
designing new ones, taking advantages of state of the art solutions.
}

论文全文链接如下：
http://eprints.biblio.unitn.it/archive/00000701/01/087.pdf
这显然不是发表的最终的版本，但内容已经一致的。想要最终版本的请去Springer下载，因为在这里放最终的版本是侵权行为。

作者的主页如下：
http://dit.unitn.it/~pavel/
上面还有更多相关的有用的论文。

推荐理由：
这篇论文是最新的这个领域内最好的综述，发表在这个领域有一定影响的期刊上，一共26页。引用的文献也比较新，作者分析的角度也和前2篇较好的综述有差别。

关于另外两片经典的综述，请参考该论文中的参考文献:[39]和[62]，当然他们的作者分别是这四位：Y. Kalfoglou and M. Schorlemmer 以及 E. Rahm and P. Bernstein。前两人不太了解，后两人是绝对的大牛。

最后，不清楚BibTex的请参考如下的网址：
http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~jacobsd/bib/formats/bibtex.html